Public‑sector procurement teams are operating under unprecedented pressure: compressed timelines, rising proposal volumes, leaner workforces, and escalating expectations for transparency and defensibility. Manual scoring and document‑driven evaluation processes consume significant time, strain limited staff capacity, and expose agencies to inconsistency, cognitive bias, and audit risk.
These pressures extend into contract administration, where CORs and COs must track funds, monitor burn rates, reconcile invoices, manage CPARS, and validate performance across multiple disconnected systems. The result is a fragmented oversight environment that increases administrative burden and heightens the risk of ADA violations, missed deadlines, and incomplete audit trails.
Quantify directly solves these challenges.
Built for Federal and state/local contracting offices, Quantify is an AI‑powered acquisition management platform that spans the full procurement lifecycle. It applies advanced LLM inference to accelerate requirement development, streamline evaluations, and support contract administration with structured, criteria‑based analysis and real‑time insights.
Unlike legacy workflow and document-routing tools now bolting AI onto decades-old automation, Quantify is AI-native: objective scoring and LLM inference are core to the platform today, not a roadmap promise. That difference shows up as deeper analysis — not just faster paperwork.
Quantify reclaims 65–70% of the time acquisition professionals spend across the lifecycle, turning months of manual work into days. Handle more solicitations and evaluations at current staffing without sacrificing rigor or defensibility.
INITIATE: 90%
Automated market research records, acquisition plans, IGCEs, and PWS/SOW drafts enable faster, higher-quality RFP creation.
EVALUATE: 60%
Streamlined proposal intake, compliance checks, and evaluation scaffolding reduce source-selection timelines.
MANAGE: 50%
Automated mods, deliverable tracking, surveillance documentation, and closeout reduce administrative workload.
PRESERVE
Institutional Knowledge
Requirements, evaluations, and contract actions become reusable institutional memory, so expertise stays, never walks.
ADOPT
At Your Pace, Under Your Control
Scale from assisted drafting to AI-accelerated acquisition at your own pace, each output behind a human decision gate.
ANTICIPATE
Real-Time, Predictive Portfolio Intelligence
AI-driven dashboards give COs and leadership a live view of status, funds, performance, and risk - flagging issues before they grow.
UNIFY
One Platform for Acquisition Management
One engine spanning requirements to closeout replaces the patchwork of disconnected systems with one continuous trail.
DEFEND
Audit-Ready, Protest-Proof.
Criteria-based scoring with clear, traceable rationale makes each award decision defensible, protest-ready..
SECURE
Government-Grade by Design
Built for federal data handling, with strict role-based access, data segregation, plus immutable, FAR-aligned records.
The Acquisition & Evaluation Lifecycle
| Acquisition & Evaluation Step | Current / Manual Process | With Quantify |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition Planning & Market Research | Manually search SAM.gov, GSA schedules, and agency archives to scope requirements and identify vendors — often taking weeks. | Quantify accelerates market research and acquisition strategy development with AI-assisted analysis and structured planning templates. |
| Requirements Development (SOW/PWS/IGCE) | Draft requirements documents from scratch or outdated templates, with multiple rework cycles and inconsistent cost estimates. | Quantify provides structured templates with AI-assisted drafting, consistency checks, and integrated price estimation support. |
| Solicitation Drafting & Legal Review | Draft solicitations move through serial legal and quality review cycles via email, creating version sprawl and delays. | Quantify integrates legal and quality review into a single workflow with version control, comment tracking, and a complete audit trail. |
| Solicitation Review | Analysts manually read through lengthy RFPs, often hundreds of pages, to identify key requirements. | Quantify automatically parses RFP documents, extracts and classifies requirements, and highlights key evaluation criteria. |
| Scoring & Compliance Checks | Reviewers use spreadsheets or Word templates to score proposals — prone to inconsistency and human bias. | Quantify extracts evaluation criteria, standardizes scoring, and uses AI-assisted analysis to ensure consistency and transparency. |
| Data Aggregation & Reporting | Staff compile results manually into reports, often taking days or weeks. | Quantify generates instant dashboards, scoring summaries, and exportable evaluation reports. |
| Evaluator Collaboration | Communication occurs via email or shared drives; version control is difficult. | Quantify provides a centralized, secure platform for evaluator input, version tracking, and audit trails. |
| Transparency & Auditability | Audit trails are often incomplete or difficult to reconstruct. | Every decision and change is automatically logged for full audit readiness. |
Post-Award Management & Oversight
| Post-Award Management Step | Current / Manual Process | With Quantify |
|---|---|---|
| Funds & Obligations Oversight | CO/COR manually reconcile obligations and disbursements across ERP, spreadsheets, and email. ADA risks often surface late. | Automated ingestion of obligations and/or disbursements. CLIN‑level tracking, ADA guardrails, and real‑time funding visibility. |
| Invoice & Payment Oversight | CORs track invoices in PIEE/WAWF or IPP manually; updates require email follow‑up. Prompt Payment Act deadlines are easy to miss. | Integrated invoice queue, COR → CO routing, and automated PPA clock tracking. Disbursement reconciliation with ERP. |
| Performance Management (CPARS) | CPARS narratives drafted manually; evidence scattered across drives. Annual reminders often missed. | Structured CPARS workflows, evidence linking, contractor comment tracking, and automated reminders. |
| Appropriations & PoP Alignment | CO/COR manually check colors of money, availability windows, and PoP alignment. Risk of expired/incorrect funds usage. | Automated appropriation checks, PoP validation, and color‑of‑money alerts. |
| Option-Year Planning | Option windows tracked in spreadsheets; performance/funding validation is ad hoc. | FAR 17.2‑aligned option workflows with performance, funding, and need validation. |
| Cost & Price Growth Monitoring | EVM, burn rate, and ceiling tracking done manually or inconsistently. | Automated variance alerts, ceiling‑breach warnings, and spend forecasting. |
| Modifications & Reconciliation | Funding actions and scope mods tracked across email, FPDS, and ERP. Reconciliation issues discovered late. | Centralized mod workspace, ERP reconciliation surface, and audit‑ready change history. |

